| 1 |
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@××××××××××.net> posted |
| 2 |
200612281559.21743.bss03@××××××××××.net, excerpted below, on Thu, 28 Dec |
| 3 |
2006 15:59:15 -0600: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Thursday 28 December 2006 10:01, "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@×××××.com> |
| 6 |
> wrote about '[gentoo-amd64] Browsing speed problems - possibly flash |
| 7 |
> related': |
| 8 |
>> Is this a firefox-bin thing? Maybe I should build firefox from |
| 9 |
>> source? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Good luck getting flash to work if you do that. :P |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Oh, it should be no problem, as long as one is building a 32-bit firefox, |
| 14 |
presumably in one's 32-bit chroot, following the Gentoo/amd64 32-bit |
| 15 |
chroot guide. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Of course, if one is building a standard 64-bit firefox and expecting the |
| 18 |
32-bit flash shared object plugin to work in the 64-bit firefox process |
| 19 |
address space, then one is in for a bit of disappointment, but that's only |
| 20 |
common sense so should be expected and go without saying. =8^P |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 24 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 25 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives