Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Wil Reichert <wil.reichert@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64 <gentoo-amd64@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] What happened to sun-jdk?
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:24:51
Message-Id: 7a329d910911100724ldda3b51j1bc2e662a36141f2@mail.gmail.com
1 Never seen a license block a package before:
2
3 $ emerge -p sun-jdk
4
5 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
6
7 Calculating dependencies... done!
8
9 !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "dev-java/sun-jdk" have been masked.
10 !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
11 - dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.17 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
12 A copy of the 'dlj-1.1' license is located at '/usr/portage/licenses/dlj-1.1'.
13
14 - dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.16 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
15 - dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.15 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
16 - dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0.22 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
17 - dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0.21 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
18 - dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0.20 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
19 - dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.19 (masked by: sun-bcla-java-vm license(s),
20 missing keyword)
21 A copy of the 'sun-bcla-java-vm' license is located at
22 '/usr/portage/licenses/sun-bcla-java-vm'.
23
24
25 For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge
26 man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
27
28
29 Checked the package Changelog, briefly glanced at the license file,
30 checked the global package.mask, Gentoo web site, and the gentoo dev
31 blogs. Unable to find any comment or explanation on why this
32 happened. Anyone have an idea?
33
34 Wil

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] What happened to sun-jdk? Akos Szalkai <szalkai@×××××××.net>