Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: John Myers <electronerd@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] dig package
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:33:24
Message-Id: 200510250835.50724.electronerd@monolith3d.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] dig package by Richard Freeman
1 On Tuesday 25 October 2005 07:13, Richard Freeman wrote:
2 > Ben Skeggs wrote:
3 > > Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2005, 09:58 -0400 schrieb Mark Haney:
4 > >>What ebuild is dig part of? I can't find it anywhere and it's very
5 > >>handy to have.
6 > >
7 > > net-dns/bind-tools
8 >
9 > It probably would be nice if somebody could expand the online package
10 > database to include a list of installed files. If you already have a
11 > package installed you can always use equery to find out what provided a
12 > particular file. However, if you don't have it installed it isn't
13 > always obvious where you can get it.
14 >
15 > I've seen objections raised to the fact that files installed can vary
16 > based on USE settings, etc. Perhaps a good starting point would be just
17 > to catalog what each package installs on the default x86 profile without
18 > any USE changes. Sure, it might only be a 99% solution, but it seems
19 > like we're going without simply for the sake of the 1% of packages like
20 > VNC which actually build more files if you have a USE flag set...
21 >
22 > Sorry - not really amd64-specific - more like a GLEP. It just seemed
23 > relevant to the discussion here...
24 I tried writing such a service once.
25 <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.amd64/4043>
26
27 I designed a system where it took feedback from consenting users, sending the
28 file lists back to my server, were I was going to do some data crunching. The
29 data from just _my_ system was over 60 MB.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] dig package Richard Freeman <rich@××××××××××××××.net>