1 |
There is a pretty large ATI community over at Sabayon |
2 |
(http://www.sabayonlinux.org) most have given up on XGL there, it seems, and |
3 |
moved over to AIGLX - I'm on nVidia myself, and for me it is mostly stable. |
4 |
There's a Wiki and an active Forum with a useful Tutorial section, almost |
5 |
all tech stuff ends up pointing back at Gentoo, so you shouldn't have to |
6 |
expect any Paradigm Changes! |
7 |
|
8 |
Tony. . . |
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
----- Original Message ----- |
12 |
From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@×××××.com> |
13 |
To: <gentoo-amd64@l.g.o> |
14 |
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 7:28 PM |
15 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] beryl on AMD64 |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
> Thanks David. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I notice that many/most folks who have talked about it seem to run |
21 |
> NVidia. I have an ATI. Any reason you know why it won't run, or won't |
22 |
> run well, on ATI? I'm using the ATI driver form the kernel. Does its |
23 |
> lack of 3D acceleration rule out beryl? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Thanks, |
26 |
> Mark |
27 |
> |
28 |
> On 2/6/07, David Pyke <dpyke@××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
29 |
> > It runs fine on my system. I have an NVIDIA card and run it with AIGLX |
30 |
to |
31 |
> > avoid the black window bug. |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> > The only advantage is it looks pretty. There's no real benefit to using |
34 |
it. |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > -- |
38 |
> > gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> -- |
42 |
> gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |