| 1 |
Duncan, thank you. I recopiled 2.6.26 and it worked. I tried it with |
| 2 |
2.6.26 earlier but it didn't work for some odd reason. Since I create a |
| 3 |
short cut to my recent kernel source, the invidia driver was using that |
| 4 |
short cut when build against 2.6.26. The symlink /usr/src/linux points |
| 5 |
to /usr/src/linux-2.6.27. I don't know why that was happening but it's |
| 6 |
working now. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Thank you. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Duncan wrote: |
| 11 |
> Mansour Al Akeel <mansour.alakeel@×××××.com> posted |
| 12 |
> 49433267.1090205@×××××.com, excerpted below, on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:56:23 |
| 13 |
> -0400: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>> In file included from |
| 17 |
>> /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-173.14.09/work/NVIDIA-Linux- |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> x86_64-173.14.09-pkg2/usr/src/nv/nv.c:14: |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
>> /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-173.14.09/work/NVIDIA-Linux- |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
> x86_64-173.14.09-pkg2/usr/src/nv/nv-linux.h:107:27: |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
>> error: asm/semaphore.h: No such file or directory |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> The arch-x86 (including 64-bit) header files were reorganized in kernel |
| 29 |
> 2.6.27, and as that says, asm/semaphore.h (or more like asm-x86/ |
| 30 |
> semaphore.h) no longer exists in .27. I won't install proprietaryware so |
| 31 |
> no nvidia for me and no direct experience with it to help you with, but |
| 32 |
> it's likely nVidia hasn't updated to take account of that yet (or if so |
| 33 |
> it'd probably be with the newest drivers, which may not even be in |
| 34 |
> portage yet let alone stable). |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> You did mention switching your running kernel back to 2.6.26.x, which |
| 37 |
> should work, but did you switch your kernel symlink back to it as well? |
| 38 |
> If not, it's probably still pointing at the 2.6.27.x kernel, thus you'd |
| 39 |
> still be getting the error. |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> |
Archives