Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Michael Edwards <zappi@×××××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:50:58
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. by Raffaele BELARDI
Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2005, 19:02 +0200 schrieb Raffaele BELARDI:
> Duncan wrote: > >>>> > >>>>Anyone have a clue why I'm getting half what everyone else gets? o.O > >>> > >>>What kind of cpu/ram/motherboard do you have ? > >> > >>RAM: 2875MB/1002MB (286%) used (I didn't see swapping during the test, tho) > >>Motherboard: Asus K8V-SE > >>CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (2202.876 MHz) > > > > > > Perhaps it has something to do with the layout of your memory (and BIOS > > configuration), single-channel vs. dual-channel memory access? > > I was thinking the same, but moore on the CPU side: the Asus K8V > supports only the 745pin Athon64, which has a single memory channel as > opposed to the 900+ pin (I don't remember the exact number) Athlon64 FX, > which includes dual memory channel. > > raffaele
I have here a DFI ut NF3 250GB Board, and the Results are equal to the others: 1324.712769 MBytes Vs. 2465.333008 MBytes AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3000+ (745pins) and two 512GB sticks. Maybe there is something wrong with the Bios settings? Michael Edwards -- gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
[gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>