Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Michael Edwards <zappi@×××××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:50:58
Message-Id: 1122400181.27862.10.camel@slackit.herz--aus--gold.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. by Raffaele BELARDI
1 Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2005, 19:02 +0200 schrieb Raffaele BELARDI:
2 > Duncan wrote:
3 > >>>>
4 > >>>>Anyone have a clue why I'm getting half what everyone else gets? o.O
5 > >>>
6 > >>>What kind of cpu/ram/motherboard do you have ?
7 > >>
8 > >>RAM: 2875MB/1002MB (286%) used (I didn't see swapping during the test, tho)
9 > >>Motherboard: Asus K8V-SE
10 > >>CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (2202.876 MHz)
11 > >
12 > >
13 > > Perhaps it has something to do with the layout of your memory (and BIOS
14 > > configuration), single-channel vs. dual-channel memory access?
15 >
16 > I was thinking the same, but moore on the CPU side: the Asus K8V
17 > supports only the 745pin Athon64, which has a single memory channel as
18 > opposed to the 900+ pin (I don't remember the exact number) Athlon64 FX,
19 > which includes dual memory channel.
20 >
21 > raffaele
22 I have here a DFI ut NF3 250GB Board, and the Results are equal to the
23 others:
24
25 1324.712769 MBytes Vs. 2465.333008 MBytes
26
27 AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3000+ (745pins) and two 512GB sticks.
28
29 Maybe there is something wrong with the Bios settings?
30
31 Michael Edwards
32
33 --
34 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>