1 |
Peter Humphrey <prh@××××××××××.uk> skribis: |
2 |
> It's just occurred to me to question this kernel configuration option, which |
3 |
> is under Processor Type and Features. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> We used to have to choose from 100, 250 and 1000 Hz, but recently 300 Hz has |
6 |
> been added, with the following Help text: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> ---- |
9 |
> CONFIG_HZ_300: |
10 |
> 300 Hz is a good compromise choice allowing server performance while also |
11 |
> showing good interactive responsiveness even on SMP and NUMA systems and |
12 |
> exactly dividing by both PAL and NTSC frame rates for video and multimedia |
13 |
> work. |
14 |
> ---- |
15 |
> |
16 |
> At first I followed the advice without thought, but on reflection it occurs |
17 |
> to me to wonder about the truth of this statement. I suspect it's only true |
18 |
> in North America, northern Japan and a few other places, where the public |
19 |
> supply frequency is 60 Hz. In the rest of the world, with its 50 Hz, I |
20 |
> think 250 would be a better choice. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I also think it would be more accurate to say "dividing exactly into" |
23 |
> than "by". |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Would anyone like to comment? |
26 |
|
27 |
It should say 'divide by', and the frame rate is a property of the |
28 |
television signal, not the power supply. |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Barry.SCHWARTZ ĉe chemoelectric punkto org http://chemoelectric.org |
33 |
Free stuff / Senpagaj varoj: http://crudfactory.com |
34 |
'Democracies don't war; democracies are peaceful countries.' - Bush |
35 |
(http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/12/20051219-2.html) |