1 |
Nestor Camacho III posted <43565060.5040604@××××.com>, excerpted below, |
2 |
on Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:55:44 -0400: |
3 |
|
4 |
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> |
5 |
> <html> |
6 |
> <head> |
7 |
> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> |
8 |
> <title></title> |
9 |
> </head> |
10 |
> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> |
11 |
> I have one of those Sun Java workstations, and figured I would put |
12 |
> gentoo on it. While I was installing it I would sometimes get the |
13 |
> following symptoms. <br> |
14 |
|
15 |
Unfortunately, I don't have an answer to your question, but... in the |
16 |
future could you please refrain from posting HTML to the list? It's |
17 |
common in the Linux and open source community to consider HTML mail the |
18 |
playground of spammers and crackers, and as such, many either filter it |
19 |
entirely, or at minimum use clients that don't parse it, for security |
20 |
reasons. Thus, HTML posts come out looking like crap, if they are seen at |
21 |
all, and folks that might otherwise have your answer never reply, either |
22 |
because they didn't see the post in the first place, or because they |
23 |
simply don't reply to those that post HTML. |
24 |
|
25 |
On the Gentoo lists/groups, people aren't as strict and you'll often get a |
26 |
reply, but it's still a good idea to turn off HTML once you are made aware |
27 |
of the fact you are posting with it. After all, is your post /really/ so |
28 |
lacking in content that it /must/ be dressed up all fancy in HTML to make |
29 |
it interesting enough to read? If not, why waste the bandwidth and risk |
30 |
offense, unnecessarily? |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
34 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
35 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
36 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |