Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: sandbox failure
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:37:24
Message-Id: pan.2005.09.19.17.31.53.915865@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] sandbox failure by Tres Melton
1 Tres Melton posted <1127007828.6208.25.camel@×××××××××.org>, excerpted
2 below, on Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:43:48 -0600:
3
4 > On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 17:22 -0600, scotthathcock@×××××××.net wrote:
5 >> I am getting few emails on this list. Is the server down? Can anyone
6 >> help with the problem I posted. I cannot update portage due to this
7 >> sandbox problem.
8 >>
9 > I'm still getting mail on this list but the volume seems to have gone down
10 > considerably since I used to participate daily. I don't know what the
11 > deal is. The traffic on #gentoo-amd64 seems to have increased recently
12 > though. :)
13
14 LOL! I've been mostly offline (and without access to the group/list) for
15 a week, due to a disk problem. I'm not back upto speed just yet, but it's
16 nice to know I've been missed! =8^P
17
18 --
19 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
20 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
21 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
22 http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
23
24
25 --
26 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: sandbox failure Tres Melton <tres@××××××××××.com>