| 1 |
On 3/9/06, Marco Matthies <marco-ml@×××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Thierry de Coulon wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I just came accross an article takling about a new program names |
| 4 |
> > "parallels" (www.parallels.com) that is supposed to do the same thing as |
| 5 |
> > vmware while being less expensive. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> You might also want to check out qemu[1], which is free and is in |
| 8 |
> portage -- the main difference is a somewhat more spartanic user interface. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Interesting, but I wonder whether a guitar player / chip designer type |
| 11 |
guy could set it up? Spartanic is not generally a good environment for |
| 12 |
the likes of us. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Just remember to use the kernel module kqemu as well for adequate speed |
| 16 |
> (somewhat less than vmware at the moment, but it is going to get to |
| 17 |
> vmware levels pretty soon). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The web page say this module is closed source. If that's the case then |
| 20 |
why qemu vs. VMware vs. Parallels? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Thanks. It's very intersting. How does this compare to BOCHS? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Cheers, |
| 25 |
Mark |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> [1] http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/ |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Marco |
| 30 |
> -- |
| 31 |
> gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives