Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: getaddrinfo(): Bad value for ai_flags
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:00:32
Message-Id: en0m1k$ik1$2@sea.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] getaddrinfo(): Bad value for ai_flags by Daniel Iliev
1 Daniel Iliev <danny@××××××××.com> posted 4593A5E0.7010505@××××××××.com,
2 excerpted below, on Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:09:20 +0200:
3
4 > whois (from net-misc/whois-4.7.19) gives me:
5 >
6 > whois gentoo.org
7 > getaddrinfo(whois.publicinterestregistry.net): Bad value for ai_flags
8
9 [snip]
10
11 > So I did "emerge -1 glibc emul-linux-x86-baselibs libidn whois" but it
12 > didn't solve the problem. Any ideas?
13
14 I'm not a whois expert by far (anyone have a link to a decent tutorial
15 handy?), but on I'm on ~amd64 here, so have whois-4.7.20 (which is
16 keyworded ~amd64) merged, and that whois query returned what looked like
17 valid data to me, here.
18
19 One thing I can say, however, is that the emul-linux-x86-baselibs has
20 nothing to do with it, since it's 32-bit and wouldn't even load in the
21 process space of a 64-bit whois process. 32-bit and 64-bit processes and
22 libraries simply don't mix, the whole reason the 32-bit emul-linux-x86-*
23 and -bin packages are necessary in the first place. (A very few packages,
24 including gcc/glibc/sandbox, compile separate code and normally separate
25 files for each bitness, but they are special cases.)
26
27 --
28 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
29 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
30 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
31
32 --
33 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list