| 1 |
Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> skribis: |
| 2 |
> Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric@×××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Depending on what the DOS fs stuff is for, sys-fs/ntfs3g might be a |
| 6 |
> > better option, anyway, though I have a vfat partition from before I |
| 7 |
> > discovered ntfs3g, and would keep dosfstools (and the kernel support) |
| 8 |
> > and/or mtools around anyway, for working with those very occasional |
| 9 |
> > floppies. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> It's not just floppies. FAT still has a major use for formatting |
| 13 |
> memory cards in digital cameras. If one is going to process digital |
| 14 |
> images with Linux one had better have the ability to handle FAT |
| 15 |
> partitions. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That makes sense. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
There's mtools as well, but it's nice to be able to mount the fs. |
Archives