Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: "David M. Fellows" <fellows@×××.ca>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Did devs change phonon flags without rev'ing package?
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:43:25
Message-Id: CY1PR0401MB11941FA2F71EF62901B167AAC7F40@CY1PR0401MB1194.namprd04.prod.outlook.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Did devs change phonon flags without rev'ing package? by Barry Schwartz
1 On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:40:44 -0500
2 Barry Schwartz wrote -
3 > Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> skribis:
4 > > > Is it still necessary to be using multilib?
5 > >
6 > > If you're running 100% freedomware, almost certainly not ...
7 >
8 > Firefox binaries are 32-bit. QED.
9
10 More accurately:
11 32-bit Firefox binaries are 32 bit
12 64-bit Firefox binaries are 64 bit
13
14 From firefox-bin-35.0.ebuild (others are similar):
15 SRC_URI="${SRC_URI}
16 amd64? ( ${MOZ_FTP_URI}/${MOZ_PV}/linux-x86_64/en-US/${MOZ_P}.tar.bz2 -> ${PN}_x86_64-${PV}.tar.bz2 )
17 x86? ( ${MOZ_FTP_URI}/${MOZ_PV}/linux-i686/en-US/${MOZ_P}.tar.bz2 -> ${PN}_i686-${PV}.tar.bz2 )"
18
19 QED.
20
21 >
22 > (I rarely run Firefox binaries or even keep them installed, but it
23 > does occasionally happen.)
24 >
25
26
27 Dave F

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-amd64] Re: Did devs change phonon flags without rev'ing package? Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>