| 1 |
For those using modular-x, has anyone run into bug 121394 [1], window |
| 2 |
corruption if CFLAGS include -fweb? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
The latest xorg-server-1.0.1-r3 does a filterflags -fweb as a result. |
| 5 |
However, I've not experienced the issue here. The bug (and resulting |
| 6 |
filterflags) is based on reports in the forums, apparently x86 folks. As |
| 7 |
I'm not seeing the issue here, even with CFLAGS=-fweb, there's a very good |
| 8 |
chance it's either because the problem doesn't occur on amd64, or because |
| 9 |
it's a gcc-3.x issue, since I'm using gcc-4.1.0-cvssnaps as my default |
| 10 |
eselect compiler target. (Actually, it's quite reasonably the latter, |
| 11 |
since gcc-4.x handles -fweb quite differently than 3.x did, due to the |
| 12 |
rewrite for 4.0. I can't say for sure, however.) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I'd like to pin it down a bit and persuade the spyderous and co. to put |
| 15 |
the filterflags behind an appropriate if/then test, a test I'd not match, |
| 16 |
of course, so it would continue to use -fweb here. That way I don't have |
| 17 |
to go back to the practice I had with xorg-6.x of sticking it in my |
| 18 |
overlay and commenting out the stripflags call, which killed most CFLAGS, |
| 19 |
when xorg worked fine with them enabled. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121394 |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 25 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 26 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
| 27 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives