Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Peter Humphrey <prh@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Unexpected side effect of GCC 4
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:10:21
Message-Id: 200611061506.32157.prh@gotadsl.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Unexpected side effect of GCC 4 by "Hemmann
1 On Monday 06 November 2006 12:59, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
2 > On Monday 06 November 2006 13:49, Jack Lloyd wrote:
3 > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:05:31PM +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
4 > > > lets ask the other way round. Why should it speed up anything to have
5 > > > X>number of cores?
6 > >
7 > > To account for I/O wait states
8 >
9 > and how often does something wait for io and how often does some data is
10 > purged from the cache, because the other make instance is activated?
11
12 The best way to find out is to test in your own circumstances.
13
14 > When I switched from j2 to j1, compiling did not take any longer - but
15 > the box way much more usable.
16
17 Whereas when I changed from j3 to j5 on my 2 CPUs, compiling seemed to take
18 less time and I didn't notice any effect on responsiveness.
19
20 --
21 Rgds
22 Peter
23 --
24 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list