1 |
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 21:25 -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:02:00PM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: |
3 |
> > <dustin@×××××××.us> |
4 |
> > Cc: |
5 |
> > Bcc: |
6 |
> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] unsubscribe |
7 |
> > Reply-To: |
8 |
> > In-Reply-To: <468CBF77.1010301@××××××××××××.de> |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Ahem... I think you missed your queue. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Sorry -- I hadn't had my coffee yet. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I also feel a little guilty that my only contribution as an AT is to |
15 |
> make fun of people trying to unsubscribe from the list. It's not |
16 |
> exactly productive, and only serves to reinforce the bad rep that Gentoo |
17 |
> has. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Dustin |
20 |
Way off topic, but since there is none for this I don't feel too bad. |
21 |
|
22 |
Where do people get the idea that Gentoo has a bad reputation? I've |
23 |
come across just as many fanatics using other distros (Debian and |
24 |
Slackware come to mind) as I have using Gentoo. Granted the fanatics |
25 |
can be irritating, but I've noticed that if you respect their opinion, |
26 |
even if you don't agree, they have useful information to share. |
27 |
Gentoo has better documentation, IMNSHO, then most other non-commercial |
28 |
distros do. The only better documentation I've come across was with |
29 |
SuSE 8.2, a commercial distro, with paid tech writers and editors (I |
30 |
can't really comment on what the documentation is like in post-Novell |
31 |
iterations). To be honest, the quality wasn't that much better then |
32 |
Gentoo. |
33 |
Being as uninterested with the developer politics as I am, I know that |
34 |
there has been a turn over in developers for what sounds like |
35 |
inter-personal reasons. But that is normal on any large project where |
36 |
people who care about what they are doing are working. It's human |
37 |
nature to get emotionally involved in your view and it causes excessive |
38 |
bad feelings if/when your idea is overruled. |
39 |
It could be the ricers giving Gentoo a bad name, but you have ricers |
40 |
trying to uber-optimize pretty much anything. Maybe they are just more |
41 |
vocal about it with a source-based distro then a binary distro. |
42 |
It is very unlikely that it's caused by the people manning the IRC |
43 |
channels or who partake in the forums. With a very few rare exceptions |
44 |
that are easily ignored, the people are uniformly helpful, knowledgeable |
45 |
and willing to assist even the most bone-headed of people (I fall into |
46 |
the bone-headed variety myself.. ;-) ) |
47 |
|
48 |
Just wanted to get that thought out there for the rest of the list. |
49 |
It's true Gentoo is not the be all and end all of distros. But is |
50 |
definitely doesn't deserve any special note for doing things badly. |
51 |
|
52 |
^^ShadowHawk^^ |
53 |
|
54 |
-- |
55 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |