Archives
Archives
| From: | Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] emul-linux-x86-baselibs zlib security situation clarification request | ||
| Date: | Tue, 02 Aug 2005 09:09:59 | ||
| Message-Id: | 42EF3800.5010702@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-amd64] emul-linux-x86-baselibs zlib security situation clarification request by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | Hi, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Duncan wrote: |
| 4 | > Is the 2.1.2 legit and fixed, or is somebody trying to man-in-the-middle |
| 5 | > things? Assuming it's legit, would it be possible to have a duly and |
| 6 | > officially signed GLSA update to that effect? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | 2.1.2 fixes the zlib issue, an updated GLSA is in the make |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Regards, |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Simon Stelling |
| 14 | Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead |
| 15 | blubb@g.o |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |