| 1 |
On this day, 02-August-2007 4:58 PM, Pascal BERTIN wrote: |
| 2 |
> P.V.Anthony a écrit : |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> <snip/> |
| 5 |
>> Apps. |
| 6 |
>> 1. Gentoo linux 64bit |
| 7 |
>> 2. Apache 2 |
| 8 |
>> 3. MySql |
| 9 |
>> 4. Postgres |
| 10 |
>> 5. Qmail |
| 11 |
>> 6. Pure-ftpd |
| 12 |
>> 7. Mod_perl |
| 13 |
>> 8. php |
| 14 |
>> 9. ruby |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> <snip/> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> aren't you forgetting the app that you will run the most : |
| 19 |
> emerge. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> This one will really benefit from quad core, and during time where you |
| 22 |
> will work on the server. |
| 23 |
> So, facing such a choice, I would also consider my comfort/time, and |
| 24 |
> give quad core a +1. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Pascal |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
What I am really interested is, how the server will perform most of the |
| 29 |
time. Will the instance of the apps go to each core in a balanced way? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
From the previous posts, I gather that the amd chip is really good. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I must say that I love the intel drivers for the network and sata. If |
| 34 |
only amd has some chip sets for their own cpus and good open source |
| 35 |
drivers for their chip sets. Intel has that covered and I think the |
| 36 |
intel drivers are open source. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Please correct me if I am wrong. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
P.V.Anthony |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives