| 1 |
I wrote: |
| 2 |
> Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> skribis: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 22:29:40 +0200 |
| 4 |
> > Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > so make yourself an overlay, put an ebuild with apropriate patches there |
| 8 |
> > > and be happy. |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Now that is excellent advice. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > I've got to get working on this for myself ASAP. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I’d recommend it. Have been doing it for years, and it is well |
| 16 |
> supported these days. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I happen to agree that in this case it is the appropriate approach. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
BTW it probably helps to be aware that (unless things have changed |
| 21 |
since I was using an overlay for it) new gcc ebuilds come through the |
| 22 |
‘hardened’ overlay. IMO they are probably the best qualified for the |
| 23 |
job, generally speaking. |
Archives