1 |
Richard Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Mark Haney wrote: |
6 |
>> Since I'm not as up to speed as I really want to be on manipulating |
7 |
>> ebuilds and portage, I simply deleted the ebuild and re-sync'd, this one |
8 |
>> came down fine and is compiling now. I thought about a bug report, but |
9 |
>> I felt that to be too extreme a measure if I was the only person seeing |
10 |
>> the problem. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> If an emerge sync doesn't fix the problem filing a bug is a perfectly |
13 |
> appropriate solution - any dev can fix this in 30 seconds (assuming it |
14 |
> is obvious the ebuild wasn't tampered with). Most likely a dev forgot |
15 |
> to run repoman when doing a commit - otherwise the digest error would |
16 |
> have been caught (in theory they are supposed to do this all the time, |
17 |
> but it can be slow). Ditto for problems when a package is marked stable |
18 |
> and one of its dependencies is not. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> 90% of the time it was noticed 5 minutes later and fixed, and you might |
21 |
> have done your last emerge sync in the interim. As a result I usually |
22 |
> resync before filing a bug. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
All of this is great information, and something I've needed to know for |
26 |
quite a while. I really like Gentoo, so much so, that I've migrating to |
27 |
it from Fedora on all my boxes at home (13 at last count). Other than |
28 |
this laptop refusing to play nice with the ATI drivers, I've had nothing |
29 |
but great experiences from it. |
30 |
|
31 |
Thanks for the help and the info. |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Fere libenter homines id quod volunt credunt. |
36 |
|
37 |
Mark Haney |
38 |
Sr. Systems Administrator |
39 |
ERC Broadband |
40 |
(828) 350-2415 |
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |