From: | Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric@×××××××××××××.org> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Glibc Update Breaks Open/LibreOffice -- Can't Downgrade | ||
Date: | Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:05:33 | ||
Message-Id: | 20110706172646.GA18733@crud | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Glibc Update Breaks Open/LibreOffice -- Can't Downgrade by Frank Peters |
1 | Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> skribis: |
2 | > What a mess! In my case there would be no problem because |
3 | > absolutely nothing was built against the new glibc. |
4 | |
5 | And the difference between versions may have been trivial, anyway. |
6 | |
7 | > So the new question is why does the binary from OO/LO |
8 | > fail to start while the Gentoo binary shows no problem? |
9 | > AFAIK they are the same package, but the directory structures |
10 | > are different. |
11 | |
12 | Was one x86 and the other amd64? |