1 |
Actually, one thing I probably should mention is that it hasn't locked up |
2 |
while running anything GUI yet. Maybe that's just luck of the draw, but it |
3 |
may be important. Who knows. And to answer your previous question, by crash |
4 |
I mean it locks up completely. The mouse driver operates for a few seconds, |
5 |
but after that it's frozen entirely. Not even ctrl+atl+del does it. You |
6 |
know, the other thing that makes me curious about it being a hardware glitch |
7 |
is that it does this with gdm, I think (see previous thread: "GDM hates |
8 |
me"). Well, the last time it locked up was while running emerge --sync, |
9 |
which I'm running now with no apparent problems... yet. |
10 |
|
11 |
-Peter |
12 |
|
13 |
On 5/14/07, Peter Davoust <worldgnat@×××××.com> wrote: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I know it doesn't actually burn the cpu, but I'd rather not cook any |
16 |
> components if I don't have to. From what I know of torture tests, they run |
17 |
> the cpu so hot it starts making computational errors, am I right? It still |
18 |
> makes me nervous. I was hoping to be able to fix the issue just by |
19 |
> recompiling my kernel, but no such luck. I'll mess with it some more and see |
20 |
> what I can do. Can you give me any advice as to what I should to to a) not |
21 |
> violate my warrantee and b) avoid killing my computer as much as possible? |
22 |
> Could it just be something with my Gentoo install? I guess that's a stupid |
23 |
> question; I've had this problem on an older computer, but it was a Desktop |
24 |
> and it was much easier to swap components without messing up my warrantee. |
25 |
> So if it were a hardware problem, wouldn't you think that suse 10.2 would |
26 |
> have run into it as well? I used to run 10.2 (used to as in 3 days ago) |
27 |
> for hours on end without any problems at all. I agree that Gentoo can run |
28 |
> the computer harder, but that doesn't quite click. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> -Peter |
31 |
> |
32 |
> On 5/14/07, Antoine Martin <antoine@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
35 |
> > Hash: SHA512 |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > Peter Davoust wrote: |
38 |
> > > Ok, first, while I appreciate your advice, this is a brand new laptop |
39 |
> > > and there's no way I'm running bonnie++ (that's prime95, right?) |
40 |
> > http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ |
41 |
> > >, or |
42 |
> > > anything with the words "cpu" and "burn" in the same sentence on this |
43 |
> > > thing. |
44 |
> > Well, if you want to get to the bottom of things, you may have to. |
45 |
> > And in fact, if the laptop is under warranty, you are better off finding |
46 |
> > out if it is broken now rather than later. |
47 |
> > Note: cpuburn doesn't burn your cpu (unless your laptop's design is |
48 |
> > flawed) and it is quite likely to cause a crash if there is a problem |
49 |
> > with your system. |
50 |
> > |
51 |
> > > Memtest86 might be an option as long as it has no potential to |
52 |
> > > kill anything. I agree, it could be the heat, and that was the first |
53 |
> > > thing that came to my mind, but Vista boots and runs for long periods |
54 |
> > of |
55 |
> > > time with no issues. I'll check it out with the new kernel in the |
56 |
> > > morning and see what it does. |
57 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
58 |
> > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) |
59 |
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
60 |
> > |
61 |
> > iD8DBQFGSRC1GK2zHPGK1rsRCsflAJ0bF0EmeIzDdPkxtokXzfRn6tGgYQCfZsTj |
62 |
> > y8Hb2SNLxD6caVPOUP2M39c= |
63 |
> > =Uo6k |
64 |
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
65 |
> > -- |
66 |
> > gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
67 |
> > |
68 |
> > |
69 |
> |