Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:22:01
Message-Id: 200509211019.40175.pauldv@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] kernel.org vs. Gentoo-64 bit kernels (xruns) by Matt Randolph
1 On Wednesday 21 September 2005 02:15, Matt Randolph wrote:
2 > Tres Melton wrote:
3 > >On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 20:23 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
4 > >>On Tuesday 20 September 2005 19:47, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
5 > >>>I do this:
6 > >>>alias emerge='sudo schedtool -B -e /usr/bin/emerge'
7 > >>>
8 > >>>Obviously the sudo is unnecessary if you're root. You can use
9 > >>> similar aliases to run things as SCHED_ISO, which I do for mplayer,
10 > >>> for example.
11 > >>
12 > >>Or, more easilly, set the nicelevel to -19 (the lowest) which also
13 > >> amounts to batch scheduling. Nicelevel -19 is treated as batch by
14 > >> default by the 2.6 kernel.
15 > >
16 > >Erm, isn't that backwards? The lowest priority is 20. The highest is
17 > >-19. You have to be root for any priority < 0.
18 > >
19 > >>Paul
20 >
21 > I would guess that Paul used the word "lowest" in a strictly numerical
22 > sense, rather than priority-wise. By the way, my nice has a range of
23 > -20 to 19.
24
25 Nah, I made a mistake between -19 and 19. Of course it should be 19.
26
27 Paul
28
29 --
30 Paul de Vrieze
31 Gentoo Developer
32 Mail: pauldv@g.o
33 Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net