| 1 |
On Saturday 28 October 2006 11:08, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 28 October 2006 07:02, Duncan wrote: |
| 3 |
> > You /could/ try turning sandbox off (in FEATURES). That's a bit |
| 4 |
> > dangerous by itself, but if you turn userpriv on at the same time, |
| 5 |
> > it should be fairly safe. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> NO! |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Just no! |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Never ever turn of sandbox. Without sandbox, files can end everywhere |
| 12 |
> in your installation, destroying stuff, make apps segfault randomly - |
| 13 |
> and the worst, portage does not know about them. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Never ever turn of sandbox. And never tell others to do so. |
| 16 |
> btw |
| 17 |
> * sys-devel/gcc |
| 18 |
> Latest version available: 4.1.1-r1 |
| 19 |
> Latest version installed: 4.1.1-r1 |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> and I have sandbox enabled. So it is not a sandbox problem. Something |
| 22 |
> else is broken on his system. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I'm running -sandbox since 09-June-2005, am I in such a danger? |
| 25 |
Shouldn't I have experienced destructive issues in the meantime? |
| 26 |
FEATURES="candy ccache buildpkg fixpackages -sandbox" |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I can't even remember why I put -sandbox feature, it was to compile |
| 29 |
something I can't reckon... |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
ciao |
| 32 |
Francesco |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Linux Version 2.6.18-gentoo-r1, Compiled #1 PREEMPT Wed Oct 18 22:52:55 |
| 35 |
CEST 2006 |
| 36 |
One 1GHz AMD Athlon 64 Processor, 2GB RAM, 2003.96 Bogomips Total |
| 37 |
aemaeth |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives