| 1 |
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Matt Randolph wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Sean Johnson wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > LOL! |
| 6 |
> > That must be for the folk that don't mind patching glibc, but will get |
| 7 |
> > upset if memcpy does strange things. :) |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> You try to do a good turn and they laugh at you. That'll teach me. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Heh ;-) I would like to see a version of memcpy.c that DOES do something |
| 14 |
malicious, without being completely obvious. This isn't Windows, a |
| 15 |
seg-fault isn't going to take down the kernel, or corrupt the filesystem;) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Cheers |
| 18 |
Ian |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives