1 |
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 12:17 +0100, José Carlos Cruz Costa wrote: |
2 |
> and for servers? like audio servers (very responsive servers) |
3 |
> |
4 |
|
5 |
I've never personally run one, but ck-sources is good for that too, |
6 |
based on reports on the mailing list. There is a server mode for |
7 |
ck-sources, for servers where throughput is more important than latency. |
8 |
I run this on my servers, but they're not exactly high utilization, so |
9 |
no difference would show up between ck-sources and gentoo-sources on |
10 |
them. |
11 |
|
12 |
Bascially, ck-sources gives lower latency than mainline kernels. If you |
13 |
care about latency (audio, video, desktops), you would do well with |
14 |
ck-sources. |
15 |
|
16 |
Daniel |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |