Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Nuitari <nuitari@××××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] initrd
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:35:31
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] initrd by William Tetrault
I finally switched my only grub system to lilo yesterday.

On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, William Tetrault wrote:

> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 13:24:30 -0600 > From: William Tetrault <xcourse97@×××××××.net> > Reply-To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o > To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o > Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] initrd > > I too have been on the amd64 platform since early last year, and am still > using grub-static, although I know that grub now compiles fine for this > platform (at least, that is what I've heard - I'm still using grub-static). > But whether one uses grub or grub-static, the installed files are the same, > and grub works the same regardless of which is chosen. My grub.conf has not > changed from when I was using Athlon XP's (although it's no longer called > grub.lst). > > On Sunday 30 October 2005 12:07 pm, Dmitri Pogosyan wrote: >> Actually, that reminds me that a year ago on amd64 architecture the >> compiled grub did not work for me (it did compile but fail to boot) and I >> had to use grub-static-0.93, which worked fine. I looked now and see that >> I still use this version of grub on all my amd64 machines. >> >> >> >> -- >> Dmitri Pogosyan Department of Physics >> Associate Professor University of Alberta >> tel 1-780-492-2150 412 Avadh Bhatia Physics Labs >> fax 1-780-492-0714 Edmonton, AB, T6G 2J1, CANADA >
-- gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] initrd DR GM SEDDON <gavin.m.seddon@×××××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-amd64] initrd DR GM SEDDON <gavin.m.seddon@×××××××××××××.uk>