Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Re: XOrg 6.9
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:19:35
Message-Id: pan.2006.02.01.20.16.35.145499@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: XOrg 6.9 by Bernhard Breinbauer
1 Bernhard Breinbauer posted <200602011844.18205.infopipe@×××.net>,
2 excerpted below, on Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:44:13 +0100:
3
4 > It's not that hard, I'm running a stable system, with a few unmasked
5 > packages. After upgrading to modular xorg (following the migration
6 > HOWTO) I had to keyword about 10 packages, because their dependencies
7 > where still based on xorg 6.8 and wanted to downgrade xorg.
8
9 > 2 tips:
10
11 > * I would advise to run a revdep-rebuild after migration.
12
13 Very good idea! In fact, that's a good idea after any major core
14 dependency upgrade, including xorg, gcc, any of the emul- stuff for
15 32-bit, glibc, etc.
16
17 > * A friend of mine was only able to compile xorg-server when dlloader
18 > useflag was set.
19
20 ?? xorg-server is dlloader now by default. There's not a USE flag for it
21 any more. Still, it's likely many of the testers have it set so if
22 there's something strange that still tests for it... .
23
24 --
25 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
26 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
27 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
28 http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
29
30
31 --
32 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Re: XOrg 6.9 Bernhard Breinbauer <infopipe@×××.net>