| 1 |
Barry Schwartz posted on Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:56:33 -0500 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> skribis: |
| 4 |
>> Barry Schwartz posted on Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:54:58 -0500 as excerpted: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> > Konsole for 4 seems to need a bit more work, |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> What issues are you seeing? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> No background image support, apparently (I couldn't find it, and |
| 11 |
> Googling made me think it wasn't there yet). I use a simulation of |
| 12 |
> handmade paper; it shows off fonts well. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Hmm, yes, I believe you're right. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
As I prefer light foreground on dark background (like a normal text-mode |
| 17 |
VC), "Linux Colors" is the color-scheme I always use, and it works well |
| 18 |
for me, particularly since I the color-codes for ls and portage, etc, |
| 19 |
probably show up better on a dark background since that's what they're |
| 20 |
designed for. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
But if you prefer a light background, but not /too/ light (thus a light |
| 23 |
but not white paper texture/color), there's several schemes that do that, |
| 24 |
but it doesn't appear that there's actual image background yet, you're |
| 25 |
right. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I was just asking because I couldn't really imagine konsole not |
| 28 |
working... but it seems it's color-scheme you're having problems with, |
| 29 |
not broken functionality. And I can identify, because I sure have |
| 30 |
problems with light backgrounds, so I can't blame you for being picky |
| 31 |
about wanting your particular color/image-background setup at all. I'd |
| 32 |
certainly find it unacceptable if all it had were light backgrounds! |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 36 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 37 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives