Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Openoffice build error (#2 to keep them in line)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:23:33
Message-Id: 200610310621.13444.bss03@volumehost.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Openoffice build error (#2 to keep them in line) by "Vladimir G. Ivanovic"
1 On Tuesday 31 October 2006 03:16, "Vladimir G. Ivanovic"
2 <vgivanovic@×××××××.net> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Openoffice
3 build error (#2 to keep them in line)':
4 > Any idea why all the
5 > examples for changing a profile in the "Gentoo Upgrading Guide" have two
6 > leading periods, as in:
7 >
8 > ln -s ../usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/amd64/2006.1/desktop \
9 > /etc/make.profile
10 >
11 > The two periods seem completely redundant to me.
12
13 Think of having a Gentoo system under, e.g., /chroot while / has another OS
14 or just a Gentoo system that uses a different PORTDIR. You
15 need /chroot/etc/make.profile to point to /chroot/usr/portage/<stuff>
16 before your execute the 'chroot /chroot /bin/bash' command
17 and /usr/portage/<stuff> afterwards. Using a relative path, as opposed to
18 an absolute path, is required to get that behavior.
19
20 --
21 "If there's one thing we've established over the years,
22 it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
23 clue what's best for them in terms of package stability."
24 -- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Openoffice build error (#2 to keep them in line) "Vladimir G. Ivanovic" <vgivanovic@×××××××.net>