1 |
On Thursday 13 November 2008, Duncan wrote: |
2 |
> "Mark Haney" <mhaney@××××××××××××.org> posted |
3 |
> 491B3FF7.7030602@××××××××××××.org, excerpted below, on Wed, 12 Nov 2008 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> 15:43:35 -0500: |
6 |
> > jevezze@××××××××××××.com wrote: |
7 |
> >> I allready took everything out of my kernel but is there a big |
8 |
> >> difference with modules or buildin's ? And X allready starts at boot. |
9 |
> >> |
10 |
> >> And why shouldn't I use genkernel? |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > I don't know about moving X, but this is a thread I thought about |
13 |
> > starting yesterday so this is very timely. I'll look at X to see how |
14 |
> > things are affected. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I'd suggest /not/ putting X in the boot runlevel, unless you're one of |
17 |
> the "It's not booted until I have a nice pretty GUI with a pointer to |
18 |
> click stuff because I don't know how to use the command line" folks, and |
19 |
> on Gentoo at least, those folks should be comparatively rare, since |
20 |
> Gentoo never has been and is not now designed for folks who aren't |
21 |
> willing to be their own admins, including those scared of the command |
22 |
> line. There's other distributions that are a better fit for people who |
23 |
> prefer to let someone else do the command line and admin stuff. |
24 |
|
25 |
there are people who know how to use a commandline and STILL want X. In fact |
26 |
out of 100 boots I want X 99 times - and I guess most people want X too. So |
27 |
just because you 'think' gentoo users don't like X, does not make it true at |
28 |
all. |
29 |
|
30 |
> |
31 |
> Here, even tho I'm on an always-on Internet connection, I boot to |
32 |
> initlevel 2, nonetwork, and without X as well. I start all services |
33 |
> (including named and privoxy, which are normally of use only when the |
34 |
> net's up, but don't require it; they start fast enough) except ntp/ntp- |
35 |
> client and the network they depend on. This way, if I'm just doing local |
36 |
> admin work, say backups, or doing a git-bisect/build/install/reboot cycle |
37 |
> while debugging a kernel regression, I get a faster boot, and don't end |
38 |
> up constantly connecting to the NTP servers I sync to, every time I |
39 |
> reboot. |
40 |
|
41 |
and for most people such a runlevel would be very, very useless. Add to that |
42 |
that after a boot you have to log in as root and then switch to the right boot |
43 |
level - another 20seconds lost. |
44 |
|
45 |
*snip the rest because it is too long to read and usual duncan talk*. |
46 |
|
47 |
a) yes we know you have great hardware |
48 |
b) the topic was 'how to boot faster' and not 'how to make everything suck the |
49 |
duncan way'. |
50 |
|
51 |
Why fiddle around with breaky scripts, if kdm, gdm, whatever can do that for |
52 |
you? In a proven and stable way? |
53 |
|
54 |
And why booting into a useless runlevel (and a runlevel without network is |
55 |
useless, for doing root stuff - except everything is broken) and then start |
56 |
all the stuff you need manually? Sounds really, really stupid. |
57 |
|
58 |
c) putting X in boot is something even gentoo devs do. So not only stupid |
59 |
users are 'infected' with that meme |
60 |
|
61 |
d) command line and X are not exclusive. In fact - konsole beats the shit out |
62 |
io vts in every aspect. And I can have a lot more konsole sessions then vt's. |