Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Big, ugly qt blockage
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:21:49
Message-Id: 5bdc1c8b0906100821k47ddfdc4l8d0e30038c21c0d2@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Big, ugly qt blockage by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Duncan<1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
2 > Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> posted
3 > 5bdc1c8b0906100550w9fc59a0g64f0244abc1ee74c@××××××××××.com, excerpted
4 > below, on  Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:50:24 -0700:
5 >
6 >> I think the real problem I'm facing in the future is that emerge -e
7 >> @system is building FAR too many things that shouldn't be part of
8 >> @system. Nearly half the packages on this computer (339 out of 815) are
9 >> getting pulled in as part of the 'system'. I don't believe it's every
10 >> been this high. I have recollections that this used to be sub-100
11 >> packages.
12 >>
13 >> @system is pulling in cups, parts of Gnome, hplip, qt, and pretty much
14 >> all of X11.
15 >>
16 >> What are others seeing?
17 >>
18 >> I suspect that none of that is required to allow my computer to boot. It
19 >> seems to be some sort of use flag inflation - some packages tells me
20 >> that I need a flag somewhere, and that somewhere is part of @system, and
21 >> suddenly @system is pulling in hundreds of packages.
22 >
23 > FWIW, here, emerge -pve @system returns 149 packages.  emerge -pve @world
24 > (which does NOT include @system in my config, newer portage without
25 > @system in @world, tho of course there's some overlap due to @world
26 > packages depending on stuff pulled in by @system as well), returns 864
27 > packages.  Both in a single merge returns 893 packages.
28 >
29 > So I'm definitely not seeing the @system inflation you're seeing, tho 149
30 > is I do believe a bit higher than it used to be.  But it's nowhere near
31 > the 339 you're seeing.
32 >
33 > @world includes all of the KDE I use (individually merged, not the
34 > meta-packages as I don't have/need/want some of the stuff from the
35 > meta-packages merged), both the 3.5.10 and 4.2.4 versions, and gtk+ for
36 > pan and a couple other packages, but NOT GNOME.  Similarly, I do NOT have
37 > the xorg-x11 meta-package merged. I'm running ~amd64 and portage-2.2_rc33.
38 >
39 > FWIW, I see many x11-libs and x11-proto packages being pulled in by
40 > @system, but not xorg-server itself.  The other big set of "not exactly
41 > system" packages that are being pulled in for @system are a bunch of app-
42 > text/docbook-* stuff, presumably for documentation, manpages and the
43 > like, tho I have USE=-doc so it shouldn't be pulling it "extra"
44 > documentation like programming and API docs.
45 >
46 > I have cups in @world, but it's not being pulled into @system, neither is
47 > qt, either v3 or v4, tho again, both are pulled in by @world as
48 > dependencies of kde:3.5 and :4.2.
49 >
50 > So it's definitely not happening to everyone.  I'd post my USE flags if I
51 > thought it'd do any good, but chances are, you'd be better off getting
52 > someone with a system closer to yours, gnome, no kde if you don't have it
53 > merged, presumably stable not ~arch, and compare from there.  Mine's
54 > different enough from yours that it'd be a lot of needless extra work to
55 > pin it down, if you can get someone with an installation rather closer to
56 > yours.
57 >
58 > --
59 > Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
60 > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
61 > and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman
62 >
63
64 I'll post them later today. The machine runs Windows until 1:30PST
65 when the futures market closes and I can do my daily backup, then
66 switches into Gentoo for the afternoon and evening.
67
68 Thanks,
69 Mark

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Big, ugly qt blockage Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>