From: | "Vladimir G. Ivanovic" <vgivanovic@×××××××.net> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] gcc 4.1 + CFLAGS | ||
Date: | Fri, 09 Jun 2006 22:01:03 | ||
Message-Id: | 1149889347.12776.9.camel@scarlatti.leonora.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] gcc 4.1 + CFLAGS by Barry.SCHWARTZ@chemoelectric.org |
1 | On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:14 -0500, Barry.SCHWARTZ@×××××××××××××.org |
2 | wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > Enough research has gone into writing code for IEEE floating point |
5 | > that I would not try to bypass it without a good reason. It’s there to |
6 | > be your friend. |
7 | |
8 | Performance is the reason we have hardware FPUs and -ffast-math. |
9 | |
10 | ---Vladimir |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Vladimir G. Ivanovic <vgivanovic@×××××××.net> |
14 | |
15 | -- |
16 | gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-amd64] gcc 4.1 + CFLAGS | "Hemmann |
Re: [gentoo-amd64] gcc 4.1 + CFLAGS | Barry.SCHWARTZ@×××××××××××××.org |