| 1 |
Olivier Crête posted <1129899610.18806.1.camel@××××××××××××××××.ca>, |
| 2 |
excerpted below, on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:00:10 -0400: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Thu, 2005-20-10 at 21:35 -0700, Yann Ramin wrote: |
| 5 |
>> I've noticed this too, haven't figured out a proper solution to this. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I've been using OO.o v2 on my Ubuntu laptop because of it. Version 2 is |
| 8 |
>> a far cry better than 1. Does v2 build on AMD64 reliably now? Anyone |
| 9 |
>> tried their luck? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> AMD64 support for OOo has been pushed back to a dot release after 1.0 |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
That's supposed to be dot release post 2.0, correct? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 17 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 18 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
| 19 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives