| 1 |
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:13:56 -0700 |
| 3 |
> Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> If you skip anything in this news item, your system will not be |
| 7 |
>> bootable, or your networking will be down, or both. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> [snip] |
| 10 |
>> [snip] |
| 11 |
>> [snip] |
| 12 |
>> [snip] |
| 13 |
>> [snip] |
| 14 |
>> [snip] |
| 15 |
>> [snip] |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Whoa! I'm so glad I made the choice to not use that mess known as udev. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> -- and I hope I will always have that choice. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Frank Peters |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Ya know, personally I wish I'd never heard or seen or used udev. On |
| 26 |
the other hand, I haven't had any real problems with any of the stuff |
| 27 |
in that news flash. I'm still using eth0 and all my systems are still |
| 28 |
booting & working. I am careful to only update 1/day so that if |
| 29 |
something goes wrong I'll have others to work out what happened, but |
| 30 |
amazingly none of what's quoted seems to have been required to keep |
| 31 |
this machine running correctly. Then again, maybe today will be the |
| 32 |
day! ;-) |
Archives