From: | "Hemmann | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Sun and GPL | ||
Date: | Mon, 28 May 2007 16:26:49 | ||
Message-Id: | 200705281823.11761.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Sun and GPL by "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." |
1 | On Montag, 28. Mai 2007, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > |
4 | > Things will also be nicer under the GPLv3, because they've extended |
5 | > optional "or any greater version published by the FSF" to be an |
6 | > optional "or any license approved by <foo>" where <foo> could be Linus |
7 | > Torvalds, X.org, or the Gentoo Foundation. |
8 | |
9 | Am I the only one who sees this as THE invitation to a chaotic licence-hell? |
10 | -- |
11 | gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Sun and GPL | Nuitari <nuitari@××××××××××××××××.net> |