1 |
On 2010-05-12 7:33 AM, András Csányi wrote: |
2 |
> On 12 May 2010 12:46, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
>> I started getting this yesterday: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> myhost : Tue May 11, 06:04:57 : ~ |
6 |
>> # emerge -pvuDN world |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Calculating dependencies... done! |
11 |
>> [ebuild NS ] media-libs/libpng-1.2.43-r2 [1.2.40] 527 kB [0] |
12 |
>> [ebuild U ] media-libs/libpng-1.2.43-r1 [1.2.40] 0 kB [0] |
13 |
>> [blocks B ] <media-libs/libpng-1.2.43-r2 |
14 |
>> ("<media-libs/libpng-1.2.43-r2" is blocking media-libs/libpng-1.2.43-r2) |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> How can a package be blocking itself? |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> Should I just unmerge media-libs/libpng-1.2.43-r1? |
19 |
|
20 |
> Maybe helps you if you read the libnpng thread on gentoo-users list. |
21 |
> The libpng upgrade cause few problems. |
22 |
|
23 |
I didn't upgrade and am not *trying* to upgrade to 1.4, so why would |
24 |
those apply to this case? |
25 |
|
26 |
> Here is the bugzilla: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=319029 |
27 |
> Here is the thread: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/cutoff=229714 |
28 |
|
29 |
Again, those don't seem pertinent. |
30 |
|
31 |
If you look at my output, I currently have 1.2.40 installed, which I see |
32 |
is now hard masked (M). The problem is portage wants to: |
33 |
|
34 |
1. upgrade 1.2.40 to 1.2.43-r1 |
35 |
|
36 |
*and* |
37 |
|
38 |
2. install 1.2.43-r2 in a NEW SLOT. |
39 |
|
40 |
This appears to be plain wrong and a bug, no? |