| 1 |
On Monday 25 July 2005 22:38, Olivier Crete wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2005-25-07 at 22:24 +0000, Luke-Jr wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Saturday 23 July 2005 18:44, Brian Litzinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > > On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 16:48 +0200, Simon Strandman wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > > Memory to memory copy rate = 1291.600098 MBytes / sec. Block size = |
| 6 |
> > > > > Memory to memory copy rate = 2389.321777 MBytes / sec. Block size = |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > Memory to memory copy rate = 1302.701782 MBytes / sec. Block size = |
| 9 |
> > > Memory to memory copy rate = 2051.979980 MBytes / sec. Block size = |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Before: Memory to memory copy rate = 557.960449 MBytes / sec. Block size |
| 12 |
> > = After: Memory to memory copy rate = 1120.773804 MBytes / sec. Block |
| 13 |
> > size = |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Anyone have a clue why I'm getting half what everyone else gets? o.O |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> What kind of cpu/ram/motherboard do you have ? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
RAM: 2875MB/1002MB (286%) used (I didn't see swapping during the test, tho) |
| 20 |
Motherboard: Asus K8V-SE |
| 21 |
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (2202.876 MHz) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 02:54, Brian Litzinger wrote: |
| 24 |
> One of the arguments to memcpy is the clock rate in MHz of *your* CPU. |
| 25 |
> Did you adjust it appropriate for your system? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
memtst 2200 1000 1048576 |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
so, yes... unless it's expecting the "Intel equivalent" 3200 number... |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Luke-Jr |
| 32 |
Developer, Utopios |
| 33 |
http://utopios.org/ |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives