Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Can't Emerge Thunderbird-5.0/6.0
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:35:51
Message-Id: pan.2011.08.24.17.35.13@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Can't Emerge Thunderbird-5.0/6.0 by Frank Peters
1 Frank Peters posted on Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:27:50 -0400 as excerpted:
2
3 > Pan is another wonder of the open source world. There is literally
4 > nothing else in its class. It's good to know that development is alive.
5 >
6 > Pan cannot upload binary files
7
8 That's changing! =:^) HMueller recently added that feature, as well as
9 the long awaited score-based actions (auto-delete/mark-read/download-to-
10 cache/download-and-save) in his git fork (master branch). The features
11 aren't stable enough for khaley's testing branch yet, let alone
12 integration, which pkovar would nail into the official gnome git repo and
13 ultimately into an official release, but they are there, and uploading at
14 least works (I've not tested auto-* actions, yet, myself, having just
15 rebuilt with them included).
16
17 If you're interested, join pan's user list (on gmane.org as a newsgroup
18 if you wish, that's how I do it). I have a pan-9999 ebuild that can be
19 set to all the different repos and branches using environment variables
20 set in /etc/portage/env/news-nntp/pan-9999, with a corresponding file
21 listing all the repos (mostly on github) and branches I know about, but
22 I've only just redesigned it and used it once, myself, so it's not
23 public, yet. But I've already asked and gotten a bit of interest on the
24 pan-user list for them, so plan on posting them there shortly.
25
26 FWIW, pan can build against gtk3 now, too, tho I won't be personally
27 testing that out myself for some time as pretty much everything else gtk
28 I use here is gtk2 only (including firefox), so it'll be awhile before I
29 even have gtk3 installed, here.
30
31 > It's not that I have some extreme irrational bias against graphical
32 > software, but, in the right hands, console based programs can still
33 > perform wonderful things in terms of basic output. Ncurses and s-lang
34 > are very capable development tools. But for some reason these things
35 > are not appreciated by the average user who, if given a choice, will
36 > usually gravitate to a graphical solution.
37
38 I use mc for sys-admin-hat file management and editing, only using the kde
39 graphical tools for user-hat stuff (like sorting thru media files, where
40 icon-thumbnails are quite useful =:^). But mail, news, rss, web-
41 browsing, etc, are more user-hat stuff here, so I tend to prefer
42 graphical tools for them.
43
44 The thing that has me hooked on ktorrent is all the nice statistical
45 graphics it has. CLI or semi-gui like ncurses can match the raw
46 functionality, but hardly the graphical stuff (tho semi-gui could come
47 close).
48
49 --
50 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
51 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
52 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman