| 1 |
2009/1/18 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>: |
| 2 |
> "P.V.Anthony" <pvantony@×××××××××××.sg> posted |
| 3 |
> 49721DB1.6080200@×××××××××××.sg, excerpted below, on Sun, 18 Jan 2009 |
| 4 |
> 02:04:33 +0800: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> FWIW, I too have the fsck service deactivated here, as you do, by setting |
| 7 |
> the fsck order column in fstab to 0. On reiserfs, which is what I run |
| 8 |
> here for pretty much everything, it's not really needed anyway, since |
| 9 |
> reiserfs automatically does pretty much everything it could do in a |
| 10 |
> normal fsck at mount in any case, and if it's beyond that, it's time for |
| 11 |
> --rebuild-tree. But I've not had to run that in /ages/, I think since |
| 12 |
> the kernel got and activated by default data=ordered for reiserfs, and |
| 13 |
> likely since I've been on Gentoo as well. (IDR which came first, |
| 14 |
> reiserfs data=ordered or my switch to Gentoo, but I sure do remember |
| 15 |
> looking forward to each of them! =:^) But, while that eliminates the |
| 16 |
> (unnecessary for reiserfs) fsck time, because reiserfs can take a bit to |
| 17 |
> replay the journal if the system crashed or the filesystems were |
| 18 |
> otherwise not unmounted properly, you may end up with the same problem |
| 19 |
> under those conditions. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
i'd like to know if there's something particular to be aware of |
| 22 |
disabling fsck on boot with |
| 23 |
reiserfs and if there are some other things than removing the service |
| 24 |
from boot runlevel |
| 25 |
to be aware of. |
| 26 |
i'm using reiserfs v3.6 revision, r5 hash with ordered data and |
| 27 |
sometimes i have lockups |
| 28 |
that force me for unsafe resumes. can this trigger the need for a |
| 29 |
rebuild tree? and, if you have |
| 30 |
experiences with it, do you know what could happen without fsck on an |
| 31 |
unsafely unmounted |
| 32 |
luks partition? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
thanks. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
dott. ing. beso |
Archives