Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: "Vladimir G. Ivanovic" <vgivanovic@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Cc: amd64@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Transition from sys-apps/linux32 to sys-apps/setarch
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:12:24
Message-Id: 1144775349.12957.28.camel@scarlatti.leonora.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] Transition from sys-apps/linux32 to sys-apps/setarch by Simon Stelling
1 On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 17:08 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote:
2
3 > Hi all,
4 >
5 > In case you wonder why emerge -uD world shows you a block, note bug 123526 [1].
6 > It's as easy to resolve as every other block:
7
8 It's not obvious to me which package (in general) should prevail.
9
10 I'm leery of simply unmerging the blocking package to make way for the
11 blocked package. Is it always the case that the blocked package is a
12 drop-in replacement for the blocking package? Would such a blocking
13 scenario every happen with, say, glibc?
14
15 >
16 > # emerge -C linux32
17 > # emerge setarch
18 >
19 > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123526
20
21
22 --- Vladimir
23
24 Vladimir G. Ivanovic
25 Palo Alto, CA 94306
26 +1 650 678 8014

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-amd64] Re: Transition from sys-apps/linux32 to sys-apps/setarch Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>