Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Andrei Slavoiu <ansla80@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] About gcc 4.1.1
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:54:12
Message-Id: 20060831075145.29041.qmail@web31614.mail.mud.yahoo.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] About gcc 4.1.1 by "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
1 --- "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@××××××××××.net>
2 wrote:
3
4 > On Wednesday 30 August 2006 14:40, Andrei Slavoiu
5 > <ansla80@×××××.com> wrote
6 > > First, -mtune is implied when you use -march, for
7 > any
8 > > architecture.
9 >
10 > Yeah, but -march might be filtered by the ebuild and
11 > -mtune not; I like
12 > using both of them. Similar to this, I have
13 > multiple -O flags in my
14 > CFLAGS so the late non-filtered one is active.
15 Hmmm, you do have a point... but I don't think a few
16 broken packages are a good enough reason to pollute
17 your CFLAGS. But in the end anybody has to make it's
18 own decisions so if you think it's worth it then keep
19 it like that.
20
21 __________________________________________________
22 Do You Yahoo!?
23 Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
24 http://mail.yahoo.com
25 --
26 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list