1 |
I was never fond of split ebuilds, because I found you end up installing |
2 |
almost everything anyway but managing them becomes much more cumbersome. |
3 |
Bad example is X - I do not have qualification anyway to decide that I need |
4 |
this library but not that one, and it seems that every single library comes in |
5 |
it own ebuild, so you start to wonder why not compile each C program individually. |
6 |
|
7 |
Saying that, I found KDE 3.5.10 split extremely well thought through and |
8 |
really useful. It is organzied in well defined (and not too numerous) meta |
9 |
blocks which contain pieces of service packages (like kioslaves) that are |
10 |
relevant to this block, kdebase-meta is fully functional minimalist |
11 |
installation, and extra apps that you may need are very intuitive to find. |
12 |
|
13 |
So kudos to developers on that. |
14 |
|
15 |
> Good input. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> QUESTION: I've been somewhat unhappy over the last year with Gentoo |
18 |
> package maintainers doing little updates to gnome files which seems to |
19 |
> drive more and more little updates. Granted, I could mask things, |
20 |
> etc., but I've found it frustrating. I've worried with KDE that it's |
21 |
> so big I'll find myself updating files pretty much all the time. Is |
22 |
> this warranted or just me worrying? |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Cheers, |
25 |
> Mark |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Dmitri Pogosyan Department of Physics |
31 |
Associate Professor University of Alberta |
32 |
tel 1-780-492-2150 11322 - 89 Avenue |
33 |
fax 1-780-492-0714 Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G7, CANADA |