1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
George Deligeorgis wrote: |
5 |
> Hi there everybody, |
6 |
> I've been working with grace-5.1.18 for quite some time know on an |
7 |
> AMD64 gentoo. This pavkage is masked with the ~amd64 keyword. |
8 |
> It is my understanding that we guys using this program are supposed to |
9 |
> report back if everything is working fine. |
10 |
> Well here I am: It works great! |
11 |
> I have extensively checked the piping interface as well and that works. |
12 |
> So if there is anybody out there that agrees/disagrees let us be heard! |
13 |
> If I am supposed to file a report about this please somebody instruct me |
14 |
> where and how. |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
FYI - your best bet in these cases is to file a bug under ebuilds as |
18 |
severity enhancement and assign it to the amd64 team. It wouldn't hurt |
19 |
to put in your emerge info details, and mention the package and version |
20 |
that you think works fine. |
21 |
|
22 |
An AT or dev will check it out and if it meets the criteria for being |
23 |
made stable it will get taken care of - generally fairly quickly. |
24 |
|
25 |
Grace sounds like one of the more obscure packages out there, so we're |
26 |
always happy to hear from somebody who uses it extensively. While we |
27 |
try to test stuff out before keywording stable, there is no substitute |
28 |
for somebody trying it out who uses it extensively. |
29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
30 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
31 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
32 |
|
33 |
iD8DBQFDXrWsg2bN8aFizRkRAok0AJ9ZAqOh5Gyax4pw7ftIzDryCyKMewCcDZRY |
34 |
3ibR3YH92ItWm1zfCjB7oeg= |
35 |
=o1YQ |
36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |