1 |
I haven't personally tried it but there are a few threads on the forums that |
2 |
say it's possible. It will likely be slower than fglrx but give it a shot. |
3 |
|
4 |
This thread should give you pointers. |
5 |
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-533752-start-0-postdays-0-postorder-asc |
6 |
-highlight-.html |
7 |
|
8 |
-----Original Message----- |
9 |
From: Mark Knecht [mailto:markknecht@×××××.com] |
10 |
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 1:29 PM |
11 |
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o |
12 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] beryl on AMD64 |
13 |
|
14 |
Thanks David. |
15 |
|
16 |
I notice that many/most folks who have talked about it seem to run NVidia. I |
17 |
have an ATI. Any reason you know why it won't run, or won't run well, on |
18 |
ATI? I'm using the ATI driver form the kernel. Does its lack of 3D |
19 |
acceleration rule out beryl? |
20 |
|
21 |
Thanks, |
22 |
Mark |
23 |
|
24 |
On 2/6/07, David Pyke <dpyke@××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
25 |
> It runs fine on my system. I have an NVIDIA card and run it with |
26 |
> AIGLX to avoid the black window bug. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> The only advantage is it looks pretty. There's no real benefit to using |
29 |
it. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
> -- |
33 |
> gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |