Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: "John P. Burkett" <burkett@×××.edu>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: attempt to emerge dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra-2008-r1 failed
Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 21:34:51
Message-Id: 49FCBC3F.4000102@uri.edu
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] Re: attempt to emerge dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra-2008-r1 failed by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 Duncan wrote:
2 > "John P. Burkett" <burkett@×××.edu> posted 49FC9720.1010904@×××.edu,
3 > excerpted below, on Sat, 02 May 2009 14:55:28 -0400:
4 >
5 >> On a x86 machine running Linux version 2.6.20-gentoo-r6, I tried emerge
6 >> texlive-latexextra.
7 >> The response began with
8 >> [Errno 7] Argument list too long:
9 >> A related problem was discussed at
10 >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262647 Although that bug is
11 >> classified as "fixed", I'm still stuck. Suggestions for emerging
12 >> texlive-latexextra would be greatly appreciated.
13 >
14 > Did you note the portage versions it says it's fixed in? Have you
15 > updated portage to one of those versions? You didn't say so, and they
16 > are new enough, it's worth asking. (I was going to mention that a new
17 > portage version fixed a problem like that, but then noticed you already
18 > had a bug URL posted for it. But you didn't specifically say you'd
19 > already updated portage, only that you were still having the problem,
20 > thus the question, given it's apparently a portage bug, not a texlive
21 > bug.)
22 The bug is marked as fixed in 2.2_rc29 and 2.1.6.12. I'm using
23 2.1.6.11. When I do "emerge --search portage" the response indicates
24 that 2.1.6.11 is the latest available. I suppose that means the latest
25 stable version available.
26
27 >
28 > Meanwhile, you should be able to avoid the issue by manually downloading
29 > the source file and placing it in distfiles, then running emerge. That
30 > way, portage doesn't have to fetch it as it's already there, and the
31 > length of the commandline to do so shouldn't matter. Note that for
32 > certain fetch-restricted packages (normally proprietaryware that you have
33 > to agree to the EULA on and/or purchase, before downloading) this is
34 > required in any case, altho for that sort of package portage normally
35 > spits out instructions, where it's not here as it's a bug.
36
37 Thanks. I'll try this manual approach.
38 John
39
40
41
42
43
44 --
45 John P. Burkett
46 Department of Economics
47 University of Rhode Island
48 Kingston, RI 02881-0808
49 USA
50
51 phone (401) 874-9195

Replies