1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
> On Sunday 29 January 2006 22:18, Hamish Marson wrote: |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>>> On Sunday 29 January 2006 12:59, Hamish Marson wrote: |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>>> I've updated recently but am having problems with whatever |
13 |
>>>> changes were made to the opengl support in Gentoo ~amd64 |
14 |
>>>> (recently?). Bascially if I try to emerge anythig using |
15 |
>>>> opengl, I just get errors that libGL can't be found. |
16 |
>>>> |
17 |
>>>> Now xorg-x11 has installed it's opengl stuff in |
18 |
>>>> /usr/lib/opengl/xorg-x11/lib/* and I've done an eselect to |
19 |
>>>> select xorg-x11 as the current opengl implementation. But |
20 |
>>>> still nothing finds it... |
21 |
>>>> |
22 |
>>>> Where exactly SHOULD the linking stages be looking for opengl |
23 |
>>>> libs? (Including GLUT etc). And if they're not there by |
24 |
>>>> default because you can eselect between different |
25 |
>>>> implementations, why doesn't eselect put them where they |
26 |
>>>> should be when it's told? |
27 |
>>> |
28 |
>>> /usr/lib |
29 |
>>> |
30 |
>>> ls -lh /usr/lib/libGL* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 29. Jan 04:39 |
31 |
>>> /usr/lib/libGLcore.so -> |
32 |
>>> //usr/lib64/opengl/nvidia/lib/libGLcore.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root |
33 |
>>> root 731 29. Jan 04:39 /usr/lib/libGL.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root |
34 |
>>> 38 29. Jan 04:39 /usr/lib/libGL.so -> |
35 |
>>> //usr/lib64/opengl/nvidia/lib/libGL.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root |
36 |
>>> 752 19. Jan 04:25 /usr/lib/libGLU.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 |
37 |
>>> 19. Jan 04:25 /usr/lib/libGLU.so -> libGLU.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 |
38 |
>>> root root 20 19. Jan 04:25 /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1 -> |
39 |
>>> libGLU.so.1.3.060401 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 19. Jan 04:25 |
40 |
>>> /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1.3 -> libGLU.so.1.3.060401 -rwxr-xr-x 1 |
41 |
>>> root root 509K 19. Jan 04:25 /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1.3.060401 |
42 |
>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 19. Jan 04:25 /usr/lib/libGLw.so -> |
43 |
>>> libGLw.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 19. Jan 04:25 |
44 |
>>> /usr/lib/libGLw.so.1 -> libGLw.so.1.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root |
45 |
>>> 15 19. Jan 04:25 /usr/lib/libGLw.so.1.0 -> libGLw.so.1.0.0 |
46 |
>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 26K 19. Jan 04:25 |
47 |
>>> /usr/lib/libGLw.so.1.0.0 |
48 |
>>> |
49 |
>>> control the symlinks. |
50 |
>>> |
51 |
>>> If the linker does not look into /usr/lib something is extremly |
52 |
>>> broken. |
53 |
>> |
54 |
>> No, the linker is looking in /usr/lib, but it's gentoo that |
55 |
>> doesn't seem to want to put the libGL etc in /usr/lib... |
56 |
>> |
57 |
> |
58 |
> because it puts the symlinks there and libGL* into |
59 |
> /usr/lib64/opengl/... |
60 |
> |
61 |
> so, are the symlinks there? |
62 |
> |
63 |
> if not, retry with setting xorg-x11, then nvidia or ati. |
64 |
> |
65 |
|
66 |
Sorry for any confusion. When I said no the libs aren't in there, I |
67 |
meant symlinks as well. (Since that's effectively put them in there). |
68 |
|
69 |
I only have xorg-x11 installed. The ATI rubbsh never works for me |
70 |
because they don't & aren't interested in supporting the PCI-ID of my |
71 |
card (Saphire9600 256MB job). [Besides which I abhore proprietary |
72 |
drivers. To the extent that I think I'll go OGP when it comes out if I |
73 |
can afford it - but I digress]. |
74 |
|
75 |
I gather eselect is SUPPOSED to put the symlinks in there... Any tips |
76 |
if it doesn't? |
77 |
|
78 |
regards |
79 |
Hamish. |
80 |
|
81 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
82 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
83 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
84 |
|
85 |
iD8DBQFD5IJH/3QXwQQkZYwRAnWPAJ9lviQhAlp3WXuCkY/nfg68LMuQBQCfW47r |
86 |
ymt1MKPrURXDk9HkKjdtgLw= |
87 |
=ZMx0 |
88 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
89 |
|
90 |
-- |
91 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |