| 1 |
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 02:30 -0700, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> However, the LSB/FHS standardized on a 32-bit regular lib, and Gentoo |
| 4 |
> amd64 has been slowly headed in that direction for about a year, now. So, |
| 5 |
> unless they reversed course and I missed it... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I'm sure Duncan is right. Sorry for the confusion. I just did a |
| 8 |
ls -ld /usr/lib* and guessed as to the meaning. I knew it was changing |
| 9 |
though, I just guessed the wrong way. On this 2005.1 profile I get: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
drwxr-xr-x 148 root root 90112 Sep 27 05:42 /usr/lib |
| 12 |
drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 4096 Sep 27 05:23 /usr/lib32 |
| 13 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 Mar 25 2005 /usr/lib64 -> lib |
| 14 |
drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 4096 Sep 15 16:23 /usr/libexec |
| 15 |
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 11 20:10 /usr/libprelude |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Currently, lib is still a symlink to lib64. However, there's the |
| 20 |
> no-symlinks subprofile (entirely experimental and unsupported as of |
| 21 |
> 2005.0, I've been busy and haven't switched to the 2005.1 profile so don't |
| 22 |
> know what the status is there), which would make lib64 the standard 64-bit |
| 23 |
> location without the help of the lib -> lib64 symlink. lib32 remains the |
| 24 |
> 32-bit location, however, in all cases. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 28 |
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 29 |
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
| 30 |
> http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Tres Melton |
| 35 |
IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives