From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD4D198005 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C55FBE0839; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AB09E0839 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.210] (unknown [24.86.176.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dolsen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEFAA33DB91; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1361936940.3997.335.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> Subject: Re: [gentoo-catalyst] patch, fix broken seed stage update From: Brian Dolbec To: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Cc: zmedico@gentoo.org, fuzzyray@gentoo.org Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:49:00 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1361895645.3997.269.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> <1361934235.3997.331.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-catalyst@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 580b8fa8-bd7c-404d-a2c0-7fc1ccce379c X-Archives-Hash: ea431dc20451e053c37c5be41af89a7b On Tue, 2013-02-26 at 19:22 -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > So from talking on IRC, it seems that the problem that led to this > patch was that a binpkg of gcc linked against an old mpc was used > during stage1, leading to a broken gcc in stage2. Stripping --usepkg > makes sense for this purpose. > > Removing --buildpkg I'm not sure about. It seems to me that anything > that is built during the seed-update should be okay to use for the > stage1. > Yeah, I thought it should be ok too, but so far opted to leave it out I thought I'd wait for more feedback. That's also why I cc'd Zac, since I didn't know if he was on this list. > Adding an option for updating @system still seems unnecessary. > If everyone wants it nuked, is easy todo :)