On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 21:22 -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > New minimal start script, moving the original catalyst script to catalyst/main.py.
> > Add __init__.py's to modules and arch sub-pkgs.
> > Update the module loading paths for the new locations.
> > Fix catalyst_support import to new location and specify imported modules.
> > ---
> >  arch/alpha.py                            |   75 --
> >  arch/amd64.py                            |   83 --
> >  arch/arm.py                              |  133 ---
> >  arch/hppa.py                             |   40 -
> >  arch/ia64.py                             |   16 -
> >  arch/mips.py                             |  464 --------
> >  arch/powerpc.py                          |  124 ---
> >  arch/s390.py                             |   33 -
> >  arch/sh.py                               |  116 --
> >  arch/sparc.py                            |   42 -
> >  arch/x86.py                              |  153 ---
> 
> We're missing m68k.py. Looks like it was missed in rebase.
> 

m68k was added much later in the rewrite. After the initial
restructuring.  I guess this is yet another rebase error.

> > diff --git a/bin/catalyst b/bin/catalyst
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 0000000..a4e55db
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/bin/catalyst
> > @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> > +#!/usr/bin/python -OO
> > +
> > +# Maintained in full by:
> > +# Catalyst Team <catalyst@gentoo.org>
> > +# Release Engineering Team <releng@gentoo.org>
> > +# Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@gentoo.org>
> > +# Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@wolf31o2.org>
> > +# $Id$
> 
> Let's remove agaffney, wolf31o2 and the $Id$ tag.
> 
> > +
> > +
> > +from __future__ import print_function
> > +
> > +import sys
> > +
> > +__maintainer__="Catalyst <catalyst@gentoo.org>"
> > +__version__="2.0.12.2"
> 
> Wrong version.
> 

yet another rebase error.  This was done long ago before more bugfix
releases were done to master.


> Does catalyst still function immediately after this commit?

I doubt it.  This is 1 of 4.  I grouped these 4 together for that
reason.